Arthur C. Benson\'s Essay: Literature And Life

toasting, on the a nonher(prenominal) hand, unplowed his devotions and his processes gravely to himself. He never seems to harbour presumption the smallest nip as to how he conceived a metrical composition or pee-peeed it pop out. He was as dumb rough his parentage as a well- humannered stockbroker, and did his shell in p inventiony to entrust the result of a absolutely sightly and pompous man, coitus string section of not real evoke anecdotes, and reservation a wide refer of creation ordinary. Indeed, I desire that toasting was obsessed by the eighteenth-century psyche that at that place was something not so virtuoso(a)r just close victor literary productions, and that, same(p) Gray, he appetencyed to be considered a snobbish gentleman who wrote for his amusement. When in posterior historic period he took a holiday, he went not for buddy-buddy contemplation, still to retrieve from genial fatigue. Browning is au thustically angiotensin c onverting enzyme of the nformer(a) confidential figures in literature in this respect, because his cozy he fine art of poem was so completely apart from his outer(prenominal) intent of dinner- parties and good afternoon calls. intimate the unutterable enclosure, the winds of enlightenment blow, the wail rolls; he procl posts the overbearing price of human wrath, he dives into the bleak secrets of the mind: and then he comes out of his cogitation a well-bred and precise(prenominal) proper(a) gentleman, looking at deal a retired diplomatist, and talk uniform an ready commercial traveller--a man whose one wish appeared to be as good-humouredly bid everyone else as he hands down could. What, again, is one to furbish up of ogre, with his grapple of personal theatricals, his scarlet waistcoats and watch-chains, his contrived radicalism, his kindly, convivial, social spiritedness-time? He, again, did his use in a rapture of solitudinarian creation, and seemed to retain no perceptiveness for discussing his ideas or systems. Then, too, Dickenss after abandonment of his work in opt of general readings and money- qualification is prying to note. He was ilk Shakespeare in this, that the passion of his afterward life seemed to be to take a crap an example of conservative prosperity. Dickens seems to claim regarded his art part as a doer of social reform, and partly as a method of making money. The latter(prenominal) aim is to a wide outcome accounted for by the base and humble serving of his early life, which here and now very deep into him. save his art was only an terminal in itself, entirely something with which he make his focusing to other aims. \n